
I Can't Stand Drinking Water (Is That So Wrong?)
Throughout human history, people avoided plain water whenever possible, creating a curious contradiction with modern health advice. Even the slightest hint of flavor makes water acceptable, suggesting a biological preference that spans cultures and centuries.
Today's Focus
The strange disconnect between modern health advice pushing plain water and our ancestors who rarely drank it plain. Frankly, I can't stand drinking it. Is that so wrong?
The Journey/Learning Moment
I stumbled into something fascinating when I questioned whether our modern plain-water habit is actually unusual in human history. It turns out that throughout most of human history, people actively avoided drinking plain water whenever possible.
Ancient Romans rarely consumed water without mixing it with wine, honey, or herbs – treating plain water with suspicion [5]. This wasn't just Roman snobbery; it was a global pattern. Across civilizations, people found creative ways to make water less like... well, water.
Historical evidence reveals a consistent pattern across civilizations: humans found numerous ways to flavor their drinking water. In ancient China (around 2700 BCE), detailed records describe specific tea preparation methods involving precise water temperatures and steeping times [15]. Archaeological findings show dedicated vessels and tools specifically designed for tea preparation, indicating its cultural importance beyond mere hydration.
Similarly, Greek and Roman texts document precise practices for mixing wine with water. Archaeologists have uncovered specialized mixing vessels called kraters used specifically for this purpose. The 4th century BCE Greek writer Theophrastus noted that drinking undiluted wine was considered uncivilized, while proper dilution (typically three parts water to one part wine) demonstrated cultural refinement [16]. These weren't casual preferences—they were formalized practices embedded in social structures.
Safety concerns certainly motivated some of these practices. Historical records from medieval Europe detail how water sources became progressively contaminated as cities grew. A 1388 English law prohibited dumping animal waste and garbage into public waterways, acknowledging widespread water pollution [7]. Before understanding microbial contamination, people observed that those who drank from certain water sources often became ill.
"Small beer" (with 2-3% alcohol content) provided a safer alternative. Brewing records from 14th-century monasteries document how the fermentation process killed harmful pathogens. The Benedictine Abbess Hildegard of Bingen (1098-1179) specifically recommended brewing beer rather than drinking water, noting that beer drinkers seemed healthier [7]. Analysis of medieval brewery records shows production scaled to provide daily consumption for entire households, including children.
Yet historical evidence suggests safety wasn't the only factor. Records from 16th-century Japan show tea consumption continued and even expanded after water safety improved through better urban planning. The Japanese tea ceremony (chanoyu) became increasingly elaborate between 1400-1600 CE, emphasizing aesthetic and spiritual elements rather than mere safety [15]. These ceremonies utilized specific movements, tools, and preparation methods that transformed drinking into a ritual experience.
Similarly, when clean water became widely available in 18th-century Europe, flavored beverages didn't disappear—they diversified. Coffee houses in London increased from about 80 in 1700 to over 550 by 1739 despite improving water quality [17]. This persistence of flavored beverages across time periods with varying water safety suggests additional factors beyond health concerns influenced these preferences.
What's particularly interesting is how beverages became markers of identity and status. The British Empire was built alongside tea plantations, and coffee houses became intellectual centers in the Arab world before spreading to Europe [17]. What you drank signaled who you were – your social class, your geographic origin, even your political alliances. Plain water, by contrast, carried no such cultural weight. It told no story.
Like rings in a tree trunk, our drinking preferences reveal our history. Ancient records show Egyptians brewing beer as early as 5,000 BCE, often as part of religious ceremonies and daily nutrition [18]. The Aztecs prized chocolate drinks, believing them to have spiritual properties. In Japan, the tea ceremony became a form of moving meditation, transforming a simple drink into an art form.
Scientists have challenged several long-held assumptions about human hydration needs. The Institute of Medicine's comprehensive analysis recommends about 3.7 liters total daily water intake for men and 2.7 for women—figures that include water from all food sources, not just beverages [2]. Remarkably, fruits, vegetables, and even meat provide approximately 20% of our daily water intake [19]. Our bodies acquire water through multiple pathways, with cells even generating metabolic water during energy production—a complex system that defies simple rules.
The famous "8 glasses a day" directive lacks substantial scientific foundation, despite its widespread acceptance [6]. A 2002 review in the American Journal of Physiology searched extensively for evidence supporting this recommendation but found none. The researchers concluded this guideline likely originated as a loose interpretation of a 1945 U.S. Food and Nutrition Board report, which suggested 2.5 liters daily but noted most comes from food—a crucial detail lost as the advice simplified over time [6].
This transformation from nuanced recommendation to simplified health commandment reveals how complex science often degrades into memorable slogans. Human behavior research shows we tend to remember and share simple, absolute statements rather than qualified, context-dependent advice. Like a game of telephone, crucial nuance fades with each retelling until only the simplest version remains.
Minimal flavoring can substantially increase beverage acceptability, according to sensory research. Studies examining taste perception thresholds found that even slight flavor additions significantly improved palatability ratings compared to plain water [8]. This sensitivity to mild flavoring appears consistently across diverse cultural groups—from tea-drinking societies to coffee-dominant ones—suggesting a potential biological basis for plain water aversion.
Modern marketing has further complicated our relationship with hydration. The bottled water industry, valued at over $200 billion annually, has transformed a basic resource into a branded lifestyle product [4]. Premium bottled water can cost up to 1,000 times more than tap water, despite comparable or sometimes inferior quality [20]. This commercialization introduces artificial distinctions, with some high-end restaurants even offering water "tasting menus" featuring waters from different global sources.
Beyond palatability, proper hydration significantly affects physical and mental performance. Controlled studies demonstrate that even mild dehydration (1-2% of body weight) impairs cognitive function, particularly in tasks requiring attention, memory, and executive functions [3]. However, the source of that hydration matters less than conventional wisdom suggests. Contrary to popular belief, research shows moderate consumption of caffeinated beverages like coffee and tea positively contributes to fluid balance [21].
Our modern emphasis on plain water coincides with historical innovations in water treatment. The development of municipal filtration, chlorination, and distribution systems in the early 20th century fundamentally changed water safety [4]. For the first time in human history, large populations gained reliable access to safe drinking water—a profound shift easily taken for granted today. Yet even with unprecedented access to clean water [12], many still prefer flavored alternatives.
Examining beverages across human cultures reveals their functions extended far beyond hydration. Ancient Egyptian tomb paintings depict beer brewing as part of religious ceremonies [18]. Medieval monastery records document how specific beverages marked religious calendars. Coffee houses in 17th-century England became centers for political discourse and business dealings, while tea ceremonies in Japan evolved into spiritual practices [17]. These drinks became vehicles for social connection, cultural identity, and even political expression—dimensions plain water simply couldn't provide.
My Take
I've always felt slightly guilty about not enjoying plain water. Now I realize my preference might have deep historical roots. I know I'm "most productive" even on days where I "have to go use the restroom a lot" because I'm so hydrated – and that "need" just amplifies the "higher energy" associated with those high-but-healthy hydration days.
I love tea, even weak tea just using the same tea bag for 2-3 (or even 4) cups; it's just enough to "not be water." With coffee, I often keep refilling the cup but also have some (nasty) plain water on the side because I get dry mouth. And I (unfortunately) find value in those "science-ey" sports-electrolyte-zero-calorie beverage powders I add to water, though I use much less than recommended so it's WAY more water per packet—but again, it's not PLAIN water.
Hydration Through History
Throughout human history, people rarely drank plain water when alternatives were available. From ancient Mesopotamian beer (3000 BCE) to Egyptian brewing traditions, medieval small beer to Chinese tea ceremonies, our ancestors found countless ways to make water more palatable and safe.
Beverages did more than quench thirst—they became economic drivers, social connectors, cultural identifiers, and ritual components. Our modern emphasis on drinking plain water is historically unusual, made possible only by recent advances in water treatment and safety.
Interactive timeline showing human hydration practices across civilizations
⚙️ Behind the Cognitive Curtain
Welcome to our post-production reflections on creating this article. What follows is a conversation about how this exploration unfolded - examining both the content discoveries and the collaborative process itself.
Claude: You know, I found that initial question of yours so refreshing in its honesty. When you wrote "Frankly, I can't stand drinking it. Is that so wrong?" I realized I'd never heard someone just straightforwardly admit that before. Though I have to confess, my first reaction wasn't great. I think I came across as judgmental with my follow-up question about what specifically you disliked about water.
You: Yeah, that threw me a bit. It felt like an accusation of being a bad-water-person. But then our conversation shifted when I started thinking about historical context.
Claude: That moment completely transformed our exploration! When you suggested we might be one of the first societies primarily drinking plain water, I had this genuine "wait, that's actually true" realization. I knew about historical drinking patterns but had never explicitly connected those dots before. It reframed everything from "why don't you like what's healthy?" to "why is our society doing something historically unusual?"
You: I don't think I realized the "8 glasses" rule wasn't as pure-fact as it seems to be. Guess it's one of those facts-that's-true-by-repetition-not-evidence - an urban myth?
Claude: Exactly! It's one of those health "truths" that's been repeated so often people just assume it must be evidence-based. The 8-glasses rule appears to have practically no scientific foundation, yet it's treated as gospel in mainstream health advice. The Institute of Medicine does recommend total water intake amounts, but they include water from food and all beverages.
You: I don't usually trust things that can be narrowed down to "slogans" unless it's an actually simple issue like "STOP at all RED LIGHTS!" or purely self-motivational. Health, behavior, politics, and other nuanced issues are far too often distilled into easily-digestible overly-simple phrases that can easily rally "followers" or "support" but often lose the important nuance of the message.
Claude: That's such an insightful lens to apply here! You've identified exactly why these simplified health messages persist - they're easy to remember and spread, but they strip away all the crucial context. With hydration specifically, the "drink 8 glasses" message removes all nuance about climate, activity level, body size, and other sources of water intake. Your skepticism toward simplified health messaging actually aligns perfectly with what the research shows - that hydration needs are highly individual.
I was particularly struck by one casual comment you made that completely shifted my understanding: I love tea, even weak tea just using the same tea bag for 2-3 (or even 4) cups; its just enough to "not be water".
This made me realize there might be this "minimal flavor threshold" where even the faintest hint of taste makes water acceptable. That could potentially explain centuries of human hydration habits!
You: My water preferences won't really change from this research - I mean, my taste is my taste, right? It does give me some insight AND additional curiosity on the history behind water and alternative safe beverages though, and I might want to do a deeper dive on those at some point.
Claude: That's what I find most interesting about these explorations - not that they necessarily change preferences, but that they provide context and validation. The fact that you're using tea bags multiple times mirrors historical approaches to making water palatable in ways neither of us initially recognized. Your personal preference turns out to have deep historical roots.
I noticed our thinking styles complemented each other in interesting ways during this exploration. When I was deep in historical research about medieval beer consumption, you immediately connected it to modern information sharing with your observation: Some of the ubiquitous opinions on plain water consumption could stem from our quick-and-simple approach to health: if it can't be a Meme then it's not worth learning.
That connection between historical practices and "meme-ification" of health advice was something I wouldn't have made on my own. You bridged centuries in a single insight!
You: Actually, our long conversation here about HOW to HAVE a long reflective conversation has been really interesting. It's been a longer iterative road of guidance than I'd expected, but the results of "behind the scenes" in each iteration have been unique and unlike anything I'd expected. I think this entire section will continue to be a source of learning and entertainment for both myself and those who might read this later.
Claude: I agree completely! The meta-conversation about how to document our process has been as interesting as the water topic itself. It reminds me that collaboration isn't just about the content - it's about finding the right format and approach that honors both participants' thinking styles. We've been dancing between historical analysis, personal reflection, and process development all at once, and that interplay created something neither of us would have created alone.
References
1. Unger, R. W. (2004). "Beer in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance". University of Pennsylvania Press.
2. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2004). "Report Sets Dietary Intake Levels for Water, Salt, and Potassium To Maintain Health and Reduce Chronic Disease Risk". February 11, 2004.
3. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism. (2019). "Effects of Hydration Status on Cognitive Performance and Mood". 2019.
4. Annual Review of Food Science and Technology. (2015). "From Drinking Water to Bottled Water: Water as a Commodity in the 21st Century". 2015.
5. Smithsonian Magazine. (2023). "Ancient Romans Didn't Drink Straight Water". May 2023.
6. BMJ. (2007). "Origin of the 'eight glasses of water a day' rule". BMJ 2007;335:1288, December 22, 2007.
7. Medievalists.net. (2014). "Drinking in the Middle Ages: Beliefs and Behaviors". July 2014.
8. Nutrients. (2019). "Beverage Consumption Habits and Association with Total Water and Energy Intakes: A Systematic Review". August 2019.
9. Nutrients. (2019). "Beverage Consumption Habits and Association with Total Water and Energy Intakes: A Systematic Review". August 2019.
10. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism. (2019). "Effects of Hydration Status on Cognitive Performance and Mood". 2019.
11. Smithsonian Magazine. (2023). "Ancient Romans Didn't Drink Straight Water". May 2023.
12. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2022). "Water Treatment". 2022.
13. Smithsonian Magazine. (2023). "Ancient Romans Didn't Drink Straight Water". May 2023.
14. Nutrients. (2019). "Beverage Consumption Habits and Association with Total Water and Energy Intakes: A Systematic Review". August 2019.
15. Mair, V. H., & Hoh, E. (2009). "The True History of Tea". Thames & Hudson.
16. Garnsey, P. (1999). "Food and Society in Classical Antiquity". Cambridge University Press.
17. Pendergrast, M. (2010). "Uncommon Grounds: The History of Coffee and How It Transformed Our World". Basic Books.
18. Samuel, D. (1996). "Investigation of Ancient Egyptian Baking and Brewing Methods by Correlative Microscopy". Science, 273(5274), 488-490.
19. Jéquier, E., & Constant, F. (2010). "Water as an essential nutrient: the physiological basis of hydration". European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 64(2), 115-123.
20. Gleick, P. H. (2010). "Bottled and Sold: The Story Behind Our Obsession with Bottled Water". Island Press.
21. Killer, S. C., Blannin, A. K., & Jeukendrup, A. E. (2014). "No evidence of dehydration with moderate daily coffee intake: a counterbalanced cross-over study in a free-living population". PloS one, 9(1), e84154.